
Intercom has announced on LinkedIn the launch of Monitors, a quality assurance system designed to replace manual QA processes in customer support operations. The new system evaluates every conversation handled by both Fin, Intercom's AI assistant, and human support agents.
The company frames the launch as a response to fundamental limitations in traditional QA approaches. Manual quality assurance typically examines only a small sample of customer interactions and operates reactively, identifying problems after they've already impacted customers. Monitors attempts to solve these issues by running continuous evaluations across all conversations rather than spot-checking a subset.
How Monitors Works
Monitors scores conversation quality against configurable standards set by support leaders. The system operates automatically in the background, analyzing interactions as they occur rather than requiring manual review queues. Human oversight remains part of the workflow, but is layered in selectively where it adds the most value rather than being required for every conversation.
The launch follows Intercom's recent introduction of Fin for Sales, which expanded the company's AI capabilities beyond support into go-to-market functions. That move signaled Intercom's broader strategy of building AI agents for different business functions while maintaining unified quality standards across them.
Intercom has not disclosed specific details about the scoring methodology Monitors uses or how teams can customize quality standards. The company's LinkedIn post indicates more information is available through a linked resource, though the exact implementation details and pricing remain unclear from the announcement.
The Shift to Continuous QA
The launch reflects a broader industry shift toward automated quality monitoring as AI agents handle increasing volumes of customer interactions. Traditional QA processes were built for workflows where human agents handled every conversation. As companies deploy AI assistants that can resolve issues autonomously, the volume of interactions that require quality oversight has grown exponentially.
Manual spot-checking becomes impractical at scale. If an AI agent handles thousands of conversations daily, reviewing even 5% manually creates a significant workload. Systems like Monitors attempt to provide quality coverage across 100% of interactions while keeping human review focused on edge cases and complex situations.
Intercom has been building toward this capability through its Intercom 2 platform overhaul, which introduced numerous AI-first features for support teams. The platform already includes capabilities like real-time issue detection, which alerts teams to emerging problems before they escalate.
Monitors appears to complement those real-time alerting capabilities by providing ongoing quality assessment. Rather than just identifying when something goes wrong, it evaluates whether interactions meet quality standards even when they technically resolve the customer's issue.
The system's ability to evaluate both AI and human conversations under the same framework could prove significant for teams managing hybrid workflows. Many support organizations struggle to maintain consistent quality standards when some interactions are handled by AI and others by humans. A unified monitoring system removes that bifurcation.
Sources
1 checkedHow we cover tool news: Create With's tool desk drafts these reports with AI from the sources listed above and checks them against those sources before publishing.



